GOB and Ashcroft going for one more round
November 6, 2017
Wife of GSU boss’ house shot at
November 6, 2017

Paradise Papers reveal Michael Ashcroft used Belize to avoid paying tax

Posted: Monday, November 6, 2017. 11:26 a.m. CST.

By BBN Staff: The Paradise Papers, a leak of over 13.5 million leaked files revealing offshore activities of some of the world’s richest and most powerful people, named Lord Michael Ashcroft for major tax-avoidance in the United Kingdom by listing Belize as his permanent residence, while he continued to enjoy tax-free benefits despite pledging to give up his “non-dom” status.

When pressed by a journalist for BBC’s investigative series Panorama, Ashcroft refused to answer any questions, muttering the words “Dear, dear, dear…” before fleeing to a restroom to hide, according to reports from the UK’s Daily Mail; a claim Ashcroft has since denied via his Twitter account after facing “a torrent of online abuse”. “No hiding..went in…had a pee..and walked out…,” Ashcroft responded on his account.

Newly leaked documents from the Paradise Papers have revealed the billionaire, worth an estimated £850 million ($1.1 billion) continued to avoid paying tax despite Parliament’s efforts to make peers pay their full share. The Conservative Party donor was domiciled in Belize for tax purposes when it was widely believed he had given up his non-dom status to pay tax, the explosive papers have shown.

While ordinary British citizens have to pay tax on everything they earn, non-doms are only taxed on their UK income. When questions were raised about the peer’s non-dom status in 2010, he denied any “impropriety or wrongdoing”.

A former party treasurer and deputy chairman, Lord Ashcroft fell out with David Cameron in 2010 and later co-authored a controversial unauthorised biography of the then prime minister.

But the 71-year-old remains involved in UK politics through his polling and publishing interests and last year said he would start donating “smaller sums” to the party again.

Parliament tried to force the controversial peer to pay full British tax when he entered the House of Lords in 2000. Lord Ashcroft promised to become a permanent resident in the UK – a change that would have meant giving up his status as a UK resident whose permanent home, or domicile, is outside of the country. The then leader of the Conservative Party William Hague told Parliament that becoming a peer would “cost him [Lord Ashcroft] and benefit the Treasury tens of millions of pounds a year in tax”.

The tax was never paid because Lord Ashcroft, who was once Belize’s ambassador to the United Nations and maintains links to the central American country, persuaded officials that he should be allowed to become a long term resident of the UK rather than a permanent one. A distinction that allowed him to retain his non-dom status.

The leaked documents show that between 2000 and 2010, Lord Ashcroft received payments of around $200m (£150m) from his offshore trust in the Bermuda. The Tory Peer continued to sit in the House of Lords and as a non-dom he did not have to pay tax on these payments.

Lord Ashcroft’s admission in 2010 that he was still a non-dom led to a major political controversy and the introduction of legislation designed to force anybody who sits in Parliament to pay full British tax. After Lord Ashcroft told the BBC in May 2010 he was going to become “a fully taxed person in Britain”, it was widely reported he had given up his non-dom status. The Conservative Party also gave such an indication on 7 July that same year. However, documents seen by the BBC’s Panorama, reveal “his true domicile is Belize”.

The new law, the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act, had not specified that non-dom MPs and peers would have to give up the status – only that they be “treated as domiciled in the UK” by the tax authorities. It meant Lord Ashcroft had to pay full British tax while he sat in Parliament, but as soon as he resigned from the House of Lords in March 2015 he was also a non-dom again in the eyes of UK revenue inspectors.

The Paradise Papers suggest Lord Ashcroft worked around the new law to continue avoiding tax on his worldwide income between 2010 and 2015. On the 31 March 2010, the day before the new law came into effect, Lord Ashcroft’s offshore trust bought shares worth £33.9m from one of his companies. His advisers note that the deal has “capital gains tax implications” but they point out he is “not domiciled in the UK at the moment”. If the deal had happened the following day, he would have been treated differently and could have been liable for capital gains tax.

While he was sitting in the Lords as a full British taxpayer between 2010 and 2015, Lord Ashcroft appears to have stopped taking payments from his offshore trust. One of his advisers notes “that there is no applicable tax as there is no distributable income”. The accounts for the trust show Lord Ashcroft didn’t receive any payments in 2011, 2012 or 2013. The accounts for 2014 and 2015 were not in the leaked documents. Lord Ashcroft announced his resignation from the House of Lords in March 2015.

A week later, he sold shares worth £11.2m. If he had still been sitting in Parliament, he would have been liable for capital gains tax on any profits from the sale. But Lord Ashcroft was being treated as a non-dom again and could legally avoid the tax. Journalist Peter Oborne says Lord Ashcroft’s non-dom status was a “huge issue” at the time he started to sit in the Lords and there was “fresh controversy” when the Tories entered power in 2010. The revelations in the Paradise Papers could cause a “major political explosion,” he said. “The Labour Party… will turn it into a first class political row. It will raise huge questions about not just the Conservatives [but] also the House of Lords.”

Ashcroft has since released a statement denying the allegations and claiming he has never ignored the rules.

© 2017, BreakingBelizeNews.com. This article is the copyrighted property of Breaking Belize News. Written permission must be obtained before reprint in online or print media. REPRINTING CONTENT WITHOUT PERMISSION AND/OR PAYMENT IS THEFT AND PUNISHABLE BY LAW.

 

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *